Jason asks:
Justin,
I’ve seen you become more and more interested in the environment and sustainability over the past couple years. Was there one thing that impacted you greatly? Or was it a slow realization?
Thanks for asking. It was definitely gradual, one issue at a time. One factor was the energy pyramid that shows the relative impact of eating meat vs. eating vegetables. I’m not a vegetarian, but it helped me realize why it’s not sustainable for everyone to live as Americans do.
I was initially skeptical about global warming, though less so over time. My late grandfather was an oil executive - petroleum put me through college. I majored in science, though, and while I never studied global warming as part of a class, I did learn a respect for science that helped me see past the “everything is fine” pseudoscience that denied global warming. I was convinced by the time An Inconvenient Truth came out, but that film turned knowledge into mission. I’m still irritated that every hot day is attributed to global warming, since I think it decreases people’s respect for a thorough understanding of science, but at least people are more aware now.
I’ve also been thinking about recycling and resource sustainability for a long time, probably since I wrote a paper on reusable food packaging in college (which was the basis for my recent “Close the Loop” post).
At the same time, these issues have gained more and more traction in our culture, so I can’t claim to be at all radical in these interests. Right now, I’m trying to focus people’s attention on those issues that hold the most promise for making a difference - that is, identifying and pushing at points of leverage for change. My two main areas of concentration are:
1. Stopping climate change, e.g. through carbon offsets, reduced fossil fuel use, and increased efficiency
2. Overall sustainability - renewable energy, recycling, composting, waste reduction, and reducing our ecological footprints
That’s my story. What about you, fellow envirogeeks?


Now that the case for climate change has become tighter and tighter, those who were formerly skeptical have switched their message. They seem to think they can save face by criticizing the suggested responses. I am open to advice on what can be done, realizing that the road ahead will be interesting and filled with zig zags.
I guess my photography roadtrip with my wife to Hudson Bay this summer would be bad idea? I’m having a hard time with with changing my thinking.
I have long considered myself an environmentalist. I credit my early 70s childhood with its predominance of “Pitch In” psa’s and the now famous weeping Indian psa. As I aged, I realized that my reading of Genesis required believers to be “good stewards” of the gifts of creation. Finally, the birth of my children made it seem imperative that they be left with a world at least as good, if not better, than I received. It’s terrifyingly sad to see Evangelicals debating the environmentalism issue as something new and often labeling it as an improper focus for their time and energy. Even non-believers know the inherent truth in the words ‘by their fruits you will know them’ and, sadly, Evangelicals are justifiably receiving failing marks.
Hi Jason,
I don’t think you should cancel your trip. While it will be necessary for us as a society to simply consume less, no one’s saying you have to walk everywhere. There are ways to take responsibility for your consumption, assuming you can afford them (such as TerraPass). Since many people have to fly a lot, and flying is very CO2-inefficient, they offer a plane-trip offset product.
It is impressive, though, that you’re challenging yourself on this.
Here’s some of my thoughts on Global Warming…
http://amtog.blogs.ie/2007/05/07/thus-spake-gore-athustra/