Paradoxes of Making a Difference [Justin]
Today we watched the short documentary film Invisible Children, which has an associated a nonprofit organization to help children in war-torn southern Uganda. These children are constantly at risk of being conscripted into militias, so they cannot sleep in their rural homes, and travel into cities each night to avoid abduction. Our friend Greg Kendall-Ball is going to Gulu, Uganda in January to shoot photos for Invisible Chilren, and is accepting donations to support his trip.
If you haven’t seen the film, you might not know that it was made by three American college students, who didn’t know what they were going to do when they arrived in Africa. Invisible Children happened, and now their organization provides education and mental health care to help re-integrate former child soldiers into society (and prevent further abductions).
After watching Invisible Children in church today, we discussed the film and what we can do. The film bothered me because it comes from a rather arrogant, youthful American perspective. The filmmakers went to Africa to “conquer” it and fix whatever problems they encountered. Can you get any more imperialistic?
That got me thinking about actual imperialism and colonialism, which are now considered bad and wrong. Are things really any better now, though? I’m not suggesting that we go back to colonialism, but that we really look at why some things are worse now than they were under colonialism. The quality of governance comes to mind.
Again, though, it is not our job to solve another continent’s problems. We can help, but African leadership will be the ultimate source of solution to Africa’s problems. Oprah’s leadership school for girls comes to mind as a way to make a difference while encouraging local leadership.
Another question involves the proliferation of nonprofit organizations. Is it really necessary for every American who visits Africa to come home and start their own nonprofit? Doesn’t this just introduce more administrative overhead, wasting money that could be funneled into existing organizations that already have their overhead covered?
I checked and Invisible Children’s overhead is 14.6%, compared to 13.5% for World Vision. Compassion International’s is higher, at 16.2%. So, while it’s a bit silly to duplicate administrative functions for each organization, at least IC is keeping their expenses at a reasonable level (which is why, for example, Greg is raising his own support).
On the other hand, the proliferation of charities does give people a more personal connection to the work being done in other countries. For example, it’s much easier for people in Searcy to feel a part of the mission of the Kibo Group than the work of WorldVision, simply because the Kibo Group is based in Searcy (my college town).
The main problem in all of this is hubris. I too am inspired by the ambitions of the One Campaign and other groups to end extreme poverty in our generation. But it’s imperialism all over again to think that we can simply march in and fix the world’s problems.
David closed our gathering today with a prayer, in which he asked that we not be paralyzed by the complexity and difficulty of these problems. Indeed. Thoughts?



