<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pro-Carbon Dioxide Commercials</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radicalcongruency.com/20060529-pro-carbon-dioxide-commercials/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radicalcongruency.com/20060529-pro-carbon-dioxide-commercials</link>
	<description>Spirituality // Technology // Emerging Ecclesiology</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.radicalcongruency.com/20060529-pro-carbon-dioxide-commercials#comment-30864</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 23:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radicalcongruency.com/20060529-pro-carbon-dioxide-commercials#comment-30864</guid>
		<description>How transparent can this be? Take a look at this organization's list of donors: &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competitive_Enterprise_Institute#Funding" rel="nofollow"&gt;Amaco, Exxon, Ford, Pfizer and Texaco&lt;/a&gt;, just to name a few. All they need now is a "paid for by..." bug at th end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How transparent can this be? Take a look at this organization&#8217;s list of donors: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competitive_Enterprise_Institute#Funding" rel="nofollow">Amaco, Exxon, Ford, Pfizer and Texaco</a>, just to name a few. All they need now is a &#8220;paid for by&#8230;&#8221; bug at th end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron O.</title>
		<link>http://www.radicalcongruency.com/20060529-pro-carbon-dioxide-commercials#comment-30741</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 20:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radicalcongruency.com/20060529-pro-carbon-dioxide-commercials#comment-30741</guid>
		<description>Is this real?  Say it isn't real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this real?  Say it isn&#8217;t real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.radicalcongruency.com/20060529-pro-carbon-dioxide-commercials#comment-30729</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 14:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radicalcongruency.com/20060529-pro-carbon-dioxide-commercials#comment-30729</guid>
		<description>What horrible science! And in the "&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq_Bj-av3g0&#38;search=science%20glaciers%20warming%20environment%20environmentalism%20al%20gore%20inconvenient%20truth%20commercial%20public%20service%20ad" rel="nofollow"&gt;Glaciers&lt;/a&gt;" spot they show 2 articles from Science magazine which recently published &lt;a href="http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2006/526/1" rel="nofollow"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;
Unbelievable!  And I love the "lights up our life" line, with the shot of garrish New York (I think).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What horrible science! And in the &#8220;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq_Bj-av3g0&amp;search=science%20glaciers%20warming%20environment%20environmentalism%20al%20gore%20inconvenient%20truth%20commercial%20public%20service%20ad" rel="nofollow">Glaciers</a>&#8221; spot they show 2 articles from Science magazine which recently published <a href="http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2006/526/1" rel="nofollow">this</a><br />
Unbelievable!  And I love the &#8220;lights up our life&#8221; line, with the shot of garrish New York (I think).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.radicalcongruency.com/20060529-pro-carbon-dioxide-commercials#comment-30695</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 23:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radicalcongruency.com/20060529-pro-carbon-dioxide-commercials#comment-30695</guid>
		<description>What would our lives be like if CO2 were labeled a pollutant? Gee, maybe lest wasteful and myopic than they are now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would our lives be like if CO2 were labeled a pollutant? Gee, maybe lest wasteful and myopic than they are now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
