Hopefully this isn’t taken as negative in any way, but I couldn’t resist a little send-up of Emergent’s new logo:
More from the Theology Photoshop Contest
Update 12/29/05:
I saw this today on Amazon and thought the resemblance was uncanny:
You can track future comments on this post via this RSS feed. You can trackback this post by pinging this URL. Allowed HTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Browse by category:
Explore by tag:
We aren't very into all that copyright stuff. Creative Commons licenses are better, so RC is licensed under this one.
Quote Radical Congruency at will. Inbound links are appreciated, and required for direct quotations.
i reckon its funny!
Hrmmmm, first try didn’t take. Let’s try it again…
[...] More from the Theology Photoshop Contest [...]
Sorry… I can’t get the image to display.
copyright violation! suit at hand! ok perhaps not.
I have an entire book of printer’s dingbats in the shape of leaves. However, I like simplicity in logo design, especially when it involves type (e.g., the leaf forms the letter “E”).
At least it’s not quite as humiliating as Quark’s predicament.
Leave it to the graphic design pro! I had completely missed this (now obvious) element of the logo.
see also the “lending tree” logo
love it!
I think it’s probably the combination of the use of the letter “e” and the color green, but it reminds me of the old ecology flag. You can see an example here.
Bubba’s Church O Love
emergentrification? thanks for the send-up!