I’ve had a maxim for a long time that goes something like this:
“God approaches us in our terms, but on his terms.”

This means that there is room within Christianity for contextualization - allowing the Gospel to take root in different cultures, and to adapt to the unique character of different people groups. We are free to speak of God in culturally relevant terms.
The second part - “on his terms” - was brought to my recollection today by a section from Kary Oberbrunner’s book Journey Towards Relevance. He recalls being taught the second commandment - “you shall not make for yourself an idol” - as a child and thinking that the Israelites were kind of dumb for bowing down to golden statues and the like.
It was not until years later, when I read The Knowledge of the Holy that I truly understood the grotesque idols that captured the affections of my own mind. A.W. Tozer wrote, “The idolatrous heart assumes that God is other than He is. . . . The essence of idolatry is the entertainment of thoughts about God that are unworthy of Him.”. . . In the Old Testament, when people worshipped God on their own terms, in their own ways, it meant judgment, death, and discipline. . . . God did not view these as misunderstandings, but rather idolatrous attempts that elevated worship to a higher level than God himself. Remember, God stated in black and white, “You shall not make for yourselves other gods before me.”
Suddenly the Israelites don’t look that dumb. . .
Tozer continues, “If we insist upon trying to imagine Him, we end up with an idol, made not with hands, but with thoughts; and an idol of the mind is as offensive to God as an idol of the hand. Left to ourselves, we tend immediately to reduce God to manageable terms. We want a god we can control. We need the feeling of security that comes from knowing what God is like.” p100-101
Powerful and indicting words. I’ve often felt the same way about idolatry commandments, and I’ve always been dissatisfied with the traditional teaching that idolatry is simply valuing anything above God. Saying I’m idolatrous about [insert thing I like] may be a good way for a friend to point out an excess in my life, but it never hit me like Tozer’s definition. I don’t have to “worship a false God” like money to be idolatrous. I just have to think less of God than I should - to build on my maxim above, to approach God on my own terms.
I’m not talking about right or wrong ways to worship. That discussion could be held, but I’m not interested. Instead, I think of worshipping God on my own terms in the sense of relationship. An arm’s-length, conditional allegiance to God, wherein I give God credit for certain things if He agrees to stay out of certain parts of my life, won’t cut it. God’s terms are total and life-capturing. I almost said life-consuming, but actually, I think that’s backwards. It’s more like our lives consume themselves (watch American TV if you aren’t sure what I mean), but God offers the chance to become a significant part of something bigger and greater than ourselves -the expression of His desire to draw all people to life in Christ.
See also: Meganarrative



?If we insist upon trying to imagine Him, we end up with an idol, made not with hands, but with thoughts; and an idol of the mind is as offensive to God as an idol of the hand. Left to ourselves, we tend immediately to reduce God to manageable terms. We want a god we can control. We need the feeling of security that comes from knowing what God is like.?
I’m not buying in to Tozer’s defnition/description of idolatry here. If you follow his reasoning, then we should never attempt to understand or even describe God. All theology as we know it would be idolatrous. And my personal struggle to understand God (i.e., restate some subset of the mystery of god in manageable terms) would also be idolatrous. I have a VERY difficult time with the tacit assumption here that God doesn’t want us to try to understand Him.
I think the idolatry comes into the process when we lock our assumptions at a certain, fixed point. When we cast the liquid molten gold into the clay form, allow it to cool, and say: this is who God is and always will be. At any given time in our lives we must have an image of God in our minds and hearts; a model for his personality and will as it applies to our situation. But the last phrase there is the key: we must be constantly aware that the model is just that, and that God is free to expand, bend, or break it. But until He does so, we must function within that model in our relationship to Him (and by extension to other humans).
Will the model be inadequate or partially false at any time for any Christian? Absolutely. But we can’t stop building these models. If we did so, the entire idea of a relational God goes out the window. I can’t relate to something that I can’t imagine, be it another person or the creator. The very act of trying to relate to God assumes myriad things about his person. So if this is idolatry, then idolatry is a prerequisite to sincere faith.
oops. That “anonymous” comment was from me. Sorry. Cookies now on.
I like your expression as a concpet in mission - works well for me and I think our people would get it too