I suppose I should explain the previous post: it was in response to this discussion on OST, where someone said that we wouldn’t have all the petty squabbles about doctrine if we conducted the discussions publicly, before the world. This leads to the idea that we need a missional hermeneutic - one that can make sense to outsiders, not just those intimate with theological nuances. If it doesn’t, there may be no point in having the discussion. I didn’t really respond to that, so maybe I’ll come back to it. Any thoughts on hermeneutic endeavors?
| permalink |
