<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7 Theories of Atonement - Brian McLaren</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radicalcongruency.com/20030518-7-theories-of-atonementfrom-brian/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radicalcongruency.com/20030518-7-theories-of-atonementfrom-brian</link>
	<description>Spirituality // Technology // Emerging Ecclesiology</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raul Dominguez</title>
		<link>http://www.radicalcongruency.com/20030518-7-theories-of-atonementfrom-brian#comment-107967</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul Dominguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 05:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=#comment-107967</guid>
		<description>For me, the perfect penitent is misunderstood by the one who wrote this, and I think, moral influence has a very valid orthodoxy, because Abelardo never was confined as heretical for this concept, and if we unite them, we may have what we call Gobermental Atonement which is making Christ the head of our own death to egotistical wants, as Adam was the head of sin as a leading factor in our hearts and souls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, the perfect penitent is misunderstood by the one who wrote this, and I think, moral influence has a very valid orthodoxy, because Abelardo never was confined as heretical for this concept, and if we unite them, we may have what we call Gobermental Atonement which is making Christ the head of our own death to egotistical wants, as Adam was the head of sin as a leading factor in our hearts and souls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
